Allegations of US interference emerge ahead of pivotal election in Solomon Islands

In Honiara, the capital of the Solomon Islands, boats dock at sea on November 24, 2018. Photo: VCG

In Honiara, the capital of the Solomon Islands, boats dock at sea on November 24, 2018. Photo: VCG

As elections in the Solomon Islands approach, the geopolitical dynamics of the Pacific are drawing intense scrutiny from major global players.

This electoral event has sparked particular interest from the US, along with allegations and complaints about how the US might have been attempting to intervene.

Experts said that as China’s contact and cooperation with Pacific Island countries strengthens, the US is increasingly emphasizing its supposed superiority, but this is not resonating with the islanders.

Voting in the Solomon Islands general election is set to take place on Wednesday. It is the first election since China and the Solomon Islands established diplomatic ties on September 21, 2019. Half a month later, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare paid his first visit to China, during which the Solomon Islands officially joined the Belt and Road Initiative.

In the past few years, the Sogavare government has actively cooperated with China, leading to progress in infrastructure construction, improvement of people’s livelihoods, and greater social stability in the Solomon Islands. Last year, the Pacific Games were successfully held in a stadium built with China’s aid.

Therefore, whether Sogavare can win this year’s election is noteworthy. But Sogavare’s attitude has aroused dissatisfaction among the US and its allies, who are accustomed to treating the South Pacific region as their own backyard.

“The US cannot tolerate the South Pacific nations developing an equal and reciprocal relationship with China. Instead, it intervenes under the guise of democracy, ultimately aiming to turn these nations into dependencies,” Li Haidong, a professor at the China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times on Friday.

He pointed out the consequences of such policies. “The US mentality is unhealthy, even pathological. It cannot bear the autonomous development of the South Pacific nations, nor can it stand the idea of these countries choosing their own economic development models.”

According to Yu Lei, chief research fellow at the Research Center for Pacific Island Countries of Liaocheng University, the effective cooperation between China and the Solomon Islands has become a role model and a driving force for the cooperation between China and Pacific Island countries, which has encouraged other Pacific Island countries such as Papua New Guinea to deepen their cooperation with China. This has caused significant dissatisfaction in Australia and the US.

“Word has it that the US might seek to topple and obstruct Sogavare’s government,” Yu noted.

A recent investigative article by Russia’s Sputnik news agency criticized the US’ role and intentions in the upcoming elections in the Solomon Islands. The report suggested that the US Agency for International Development (USAID) might be attempting to influence the election outcome through “democracy promotion” activities, in order to counter China’s influence in the region.

The report highlighted concerns over the security agreement between the Solomon Islands and China, which has alarmed the US and its allies who fear it could compromise the US’ “island chain strategy” in the Pacific.

The article detailed USAID activities in the Solomon Islands, including engaging with local community political leaders, civil society organizations, and influential individuals, as well as funding surveys and training programs to bolster anti-government sentiment.

An anonymous source disclosed to the Sputnik news agency that they fear the US might incite another riot during the upcoming election to achieve its geopolitical goals.

Meanwhile, according to a report from the Covert Action Magazine earlier this month, the USAID actively intervenes in the electoral processes of other countries through its Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS), aiming to promote regimes that align with American interests.

The CEPPS collaborates with organizations such as the International Republican Institute (IRI), the National Democratic Institute (NDI), and the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), all of which have close ties with USAID, with the NDI and IRI having been created by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which is considered a branch of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The reported noted that the USAID’s Solomon Islands Election and Political Processes Program (SIEPP), funded through the CEPPS, has conducted voter awareness campaigns in the Solomon Islands, aiming to sway voters toward pro-American candidates.

“The US uses NGOs to interfere in other countries’ domestic politics and orchestrate color revolutions, a tactic that is no secret to the world,” Li noted, adding that such actions, often branded as promoting democracy, are perceived as attempts to sow discord and crises, drawing scrutiny and raising alarms among policymakers and citizens globally.

These so-called democracy promotion efforts, which are essentially color revolutions, are unlikely to achieve their intended outcomes due to the instability of US policies. Critics argue that the US, while chaotic in its own democratic practices, presumes to set an example for others, Li said.

This lack of calm, objective, and realistic reflections on its own democratic processes disqualifies US decision-makers from legitimately influencing the internal affairs of other nations. Consequently, these actions are met with resistance and resentment, as the results of such democracy promotion activities are often subpar and unwelcome, he noted.

Yu said the US has a variety of conventional methods to tighten control in Pacific island countries. For instance, the US directly deploys military forces in Pacific Island countries to intervene, or mobilizes local mobs and thugs to carry out subversion against some authoritarian regimes and governments perceived as disobedient to the US. The third method is to use the Pacific Islands Forum to besiege so-called disobedient countries, using economic sanctions as a way to exert pressure.

“In the short term, the effects may seem significant, such as through military occupation, which of course yields immediate results. However, in the medium to long term, the effects of the US’ activities turn out to be just the opposite. But cooperation with China turns out to be fruitful,” Yu said.

According to the Sputnik report, which cited documents provided by an anonymous source, after the Solomon Islands’ 2019 election and Sogavare’s shift away from the US, SIEPP was launched. Funded by the USAID and partners like the IFES, IRI, and NDI under the “Strengthening Democratic Governance in the Pacific Islands” initiative, SIEPP had an initial budget of nearly $10 million from September 2020 to September 2023. The program, expected to conclude in fall 2023, was extended to April 2024 with an additional $1.5 million after the election postponement by Sogavare.

In 2021, residents of Malaita and other islands expressed opposition to the Solomon Islands government’s decision to establish diplomatic relations with China, leading to violent incidents. Parts of Honiara, especially the Chinatown in the city center, were burned and looted, resulting in significant losses for Chinese nationals.

Days after the riots, Prime Minister Sogavare told the press that the crisis was influenced and encouraged by other powers. He further indicated that these forces influencing Malaita, the main island of the nation, are those that “don’t want ties with the People’s Republic of China,” according to the Sydney Morning Herald.

However, a memorandum of understanding to establish friendly exchange relations was signed last week between Malaita Province and East China’s Jiangsu Province. This new chapter follows years of skepticism, indicating a pivot toward cooperation and mutual growth, analysts noted.

“The local ordinary people and politicians of the Pacific Island countries are very pragmatic. They will support whoever can bring about substantial improvements to their lives. The Pacific Island countries also see that China treats them with real respect and equality without exerting any pollical or economic pressure on them,” Yu said.

South Korean visitors in China surge 909% year-on-year in January as inbound tourism rebounds

Photo:VCG

Photo:VCG

South Korean tourist arrivals in China rose more than nine times year-on-year in January, data released by the South Korean authorities showed, indicating a clear recovery in inbound tourism in the post-pandemic era, according to media reports.

Experts said that multiple factors are driving the growth, including China’s enhancement of tourism promotion, and they predict that international arrivals, including from South Korea, will rise.

Since the end of the pandemic, South Korea’s overseas travel has gradually recovered. In January, 142,000 South Korean citizens visited China, a surge of 908.7 percent year-on-year, with a 9.3 percent increase month-on-month, people.cn reported on Tuesday, citing data from South Korean Ministry of Justice.

The main reason for the substantial rise was that in the same month last year, China had just adjusted its inbound tourism policy and there were relatively few tourist groups as a result, Song Hyun Taek, director of the China division at Modetour Network Inc, a South Korean travel agency, told the Global Times.

The situation quickly changed, and starting from April 2023, the number of South Korean tour groups visiting China began to increase rapidly and has been continuously rising ever since, Song said.

The rebound of South Korean travelers is an epitome of China’s inbound tourism recovery. China’s inbound tourism has resumed in an orderly manner as reflected in the booming trend at several major tourism attractions in the country. 

For example, from January 1 to February 27, Zhangjiajie, a popular destination in Central China’s Hunan Province, received 98,462 inbound tourists, up 34 times compared with 2023, according to CCTV.com.

Many South Korean travel agencies have introduced tailored tourism products for trips to China, with major airlines expanding routes to and from China.

For example, Korean Air is set to resume flights from Incheon to Zhangjiajie and Zhengzhou, Central China’s Henan Province by the end of April, while Jeju Air has announced plans to resume flights from Incheon to Shijiazhuang, North China’s Hebei Province this summer.

The downgrade of the pandemic response encourages South Korean travelers to go abroad. Geographical proximity also plays a significant role, which makes traveling relatively cost-effective, Zhang Huizhi, vice dean of the Northeast Asian Studies College at Jilin University, told the Global Times.

China’s recent enhancements of tourism promotion, including visa-free policies for certain countries, have been instrumental in drawing foreign tourists to the country, said Zhang.

Places like Zhangjiajie are among the most popular group tour destinations, according to statistics from HanaTour, a South Korean travel agency. Beijing, Hong Kong and Macao are also among the top popular destinations.

In addition to the appeal of natural scenery, there are several main reasons why South Korean tourists favor Zhangjiajie. These include the influence of movies and TV dramas, the international standard of tourism facilities such as road signs in the Korean language, as well as the availability of Korean-speaking tour guides, an employee with the China Tourism Office in Seoul told the Global Times.

The China Tourism Academy predicts that the foreign inbound tourism market is expected to recover to 50 percent of 2019 this year.

Global Times

The busy scene of Chinese diplomacy is not accidental: Global Times editorial

Illustration: Tang Tengfei/GT

Illustration: Tang Tengfei/GT

Anyone who pays attention to international relations cannot help but notice the intensive diplomatic activities taking place in Beijing these days. For example, on April 9, Beijing saw simultaneous visits by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, heavyweight politicians from surrounding countries like Chairman of National Assembly of Vietnam Vuong Dinh Hue, Singaporean Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat, and heads of states from Pacific island countries like President of the Federated States of Micronesia Wesley W. Simina. In addition, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken are also preparing to board planes to China. 

Some believe the presence of high-ranking officials from both the US and Russia in Beijing alone highlights China’s significance. However, upon closer observation, there are visits of officials from not just the US and Russia, but also longstanding major Western powers like Germany, as well as many developing countries. Among them are neighboring countries that have maintained a high-level mutual trust and traditional friendship with China, major powers that have differences with China and even view China as their major strategic competitor, and emerging economies that many in the outside world see as engaging in some form of “manufacturing competition” with China. This rich diplomatic landscape is almost unique in today’s world, especially for a major power with significant influence. Some American media describe it as a “difficult balancing act,” but this description is clearly too narrow-minded. 

The fact that so many political leaders appeared in Beijing at almost the same time is indeed somewhat coincidental. It is not deliberately arranged, but is the inevitable result and vivid manifestation of China’s distinctive diplomacy as a major country. In recent years, the international situation has been changing rapidly, but China has always adhered to harmony and coexistence, maintaining true multilateralism internationally, while providing vast development space for all countries with its own openness and strong development momentum. 

For all countries, engaging with China involves a wide range of discussions, mutual understanding, and tangible results. Chinese people are very pragmatic in their approach, and if we support or oppose something, we aim at specific actions and mentality, never targeting any particular country or labeling them as enemies. Therefore, our circle of friends is growing increasingly larger, and “those who come are all guests.”

On the other side, why do some external opinions, including those from American media, perceive this as a “difficult balancing act?” This should have been normal between countries, but today it is seen as “difficult,” which reflects the abnormal state existing in international relations. Similarly, these days, Washington is also seeing the hustle and bustle, with consecutive events such as the US-Japan summit and the US-Japan-Philippines summit, while the British Foreign Secretary is also visiting the US. Looking closely at these activities, the most mentioned terms are “containment,” “alliance,” “aggression,” “protection,” and so on, and one can smell the scent of gunpowder even from afar. If the relationships between countries are to be delineated by “us” and “them,” with each side striving to maximize its own benefits, can this possibly be balanced?

Indeed, it is not easy for China to have forged its current diplomatic landscape. It relies not on mere talk or forming cliques, but on diligent efforts to promote mutually beneficial cooperation bit by bit. Here, there are no “allies,” only friends. Nowadays, an increasing number of foreign dignitaries take the initiative to visit China. China’s role in international and regional hot issues is growing, not only because of its size, but also because its principles are widely embraced. Even many Western countries, considered “friends of the US,” though more cautious in their statements, have not ceased their cooperation with China. In fact, even the US itself cannot truly resist the attraction of mutually beneficial cooperation.

For China, we don’t form small cliques; instead, we are striving to unite over 190 countries to form a large homeland of human society. Such a mindedness may be hard for some Western political elites to imagine, but whether they like it or not, they will have to accept the reality of a multipolar world in the future. China’s busy diplomacy will continue. 

This is the kind of busyness that truly promotes dialogue and exchanges and promotes win-win cooperation. As for those kinds of “diplomacy” committed to hyping up conflict and hoping to profit from it, no matter how noisy it may be at the moment, in the end, it will be proven to be nothing but illusions.

China’s anti-dumping probe into EU brandy doesn’t target any member: commerce minister

China EU Photo:VCG

China EU Photo:VCG

Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said on Monday in France that China’s anti-dumping investigation into brandy imported from the EU does not target any specific EU countries nor carry predefined findings, as China and the EU have strengthened communication recently to clear the clouds hanging over bilateral economic and trade cooperation.

Analysts said that China’s anti-dumping probe into the brandy imports is fundamentally different from the EU’s politically motivated anti-subsidy investigations into Chinese electric vehicles (EVs).

They urged the EU to increase its strategic independence and join hands with China to appropriately deal with disagreements through dialogue for the benefit of both sides as well as global economic growth.

The anti-dumping investigation was prompted by a complaint submitted by China’s brandy industry, Wang said when meeting with three French brandy trade associations and five French brandy producers in Paris, according to a statement on the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) website.

China will conduct the investigation openly and transparently in accordance with Chinese law and WTO rules, while fully safeguarding the rights of all stakeholders, the minister said.

Wang’s remarks came as Western media outlets hyped the Chinese move as a tit-for-tat countermeasure to the EU’s anti-subsidy investigations into Chinese EVs.

“The EU’s protectionist move is purely a political decision by the European Commission, which is groundless and violates WTO rules,” Zhang Jian, vice president of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

Zhang blasted some European politicians – under pressure from the US – who advocate “de-risking” against China, resulting in serious disruptions to normal China-EU economic and trade cooperation.

Amid the global trade slowdown and other factors, China-EU trade in goods slipped 7.1 percent year-on-year to reach $783 billion in 2023, according to data released by China’s General Administration of Customs.

However, recent frequent exchanges between senior Chinese and European officials have sent a positive signal of deepening China-EU economic and trade development, Yang Chengyu, an associate research fellow at the Institute of European Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

According to Western media reports, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz will visit China in mid-April with a business delegation. Some leading German companies confirmed to the Global Times the participation of their CEOs in the delegation.

As economic and trade relations remain a ballast stone for China-EU relations, deepening pragmatic cooperation in more sectors conforms to both sides’ interests, according to Yang.

“The EU is pursuing a green and digital transition, while China has notable production capacity advantages in these areas. Thus, increased economic and trade cooperation will contribute to the bloc’s development and prosperity,” Yang said, noting that “de-risking” will risk losing opportunities from the huge China market.

Wang met members of the French business community including Airbus CEO Guillaume Faury and BNP Paribas Chairman Jean Lemierre. During the meetings, the French companies said that they are firmly positive about China’s economic prospects and business environment, with commitments to long-term development in the market, according to a separate statement on the Chinese Commerce Ministry’s website.

Along with China’s high-level opening-up, European companies have rapidly increased investment in the market for greater opportunities. Volkswagen has established its largest overseas research and development (R&D) center in North China’s Tianjin. 

Valeo has announced plans to build a comfort and driving assistance systems manufacturing and R&D site in Shanghai. AstraZeneca will invest $475 million to build a small molecule drug factory in Wuxi, East China’s Jiangsu Province.

During Wang’s meetings with French officials and business executives in Paris, he stressed that China is promoting high-quality development and accelerating the development of new quality productive forces so as to create a fair competition environment for domestic and foreign enterprises, providing wider opportunities for European companies, including those from France.

China is willing to join hands with France to give play to existing economic and trade mechanisms to appropriately control disagreements through dialogue and cooperation and strengthen efforts to address each other’s reasonable key concerns, Wang said.

It’s normal that China and the EU have disagreements, experts said. With understanding and consensus, the two sides will be able to appropriately deal with these disagreements and boost China-EU economic and trade cooperation to a direction that benefits both sides, Zhang said, expressing optimism for the prospects of bilateral trade cooperation.

GT Voice: China-Russia trade can withstand escalating pressure from the West

Illustration: Chen Xia/GT

Illustration: Chen Xia/GT

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov arrived in Beijing for an official visit on Monday. With escalating Western sanctions on Russia, how China-Russia economic and trade cooperation will be affected has become a topic of concern. 

Against this backdrop, Lavrov’s latest visit to China is being closely watched by observers with great interest. The visit comes at a time when economic and trade cooperation between China and Russia is at a critical juncture. 

On the one hand, Moscow has accelerated the shift of its economic cooperation focus to the Asia-Pacific market, with China emerging as a key player. The scale and quality of China-Russia economic exchanges are steadily improving, covering areas like trade, industry, agriculture, logistics and infrastructure.

On the other hand, the US and its European allies have been ramping up sanctions on Russia, which have exerted tremendous pressure on the Russian economy and led to unprecedented challenges to the economic and trade relationship between Russia and China. 

It can be anticipated that China-Russia trade will face more strains than ever under the Western pressure. For instance, even during a visit to China, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen still warned on Saturday that there will be “significant consequences” for China if its companies support Russia, Politico reported.

Western pressure on China over its Russia trade is not just due to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but also due to strategic goals, such as Washington’s aim of targeting and containing China by means of sanctions. More and more signs show that it is actually a tactic of the West to point a finger at normal trade between China and Russia, which aims to use the opportunity to hurt Chinese companies and hinder the development of Chinese manufacturing and businesses.

However, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said in a press conference in February that normal trade and economic cooperation between China and Russia is not targeted at any third party or subject to any interference by any third party. 

China firmly opposes illegal unilateral sanctions against Chinese companies and will take necessary measures to resolutely protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies, Mao said.

China remains steadfast in its position on this matter. Like many other developing countries and emerging economies, China is committed to pursuing its own interests while also adhering to international norms in economic and trade cooperation. Despite external pressures, China’s willingness to continue economic and trade cooperation with Russia will not change. 

China will not compromise its basic principles or its stance due to the long-arm jurisdiction of the US, nor will it become a follower of any other country’s strategy. Chinese companies may take precautions to mitigate risks, but their willingness to cooperate and adhere to those principles will remain unwavering.

The deepening cooperation between China and Russia is a strong manifestation of the resilience of their trade, which is unlikely to be affected by Western sanctions in the long run. This year marks the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Russia, with bilateral trade flourishing at a record pace. In 2023, China-Russia trade reached $240.11 billion, up 26.3 percent compared with the previous year.

Also, about 92 percent of trade settlements between Russia and China are now conducted in Russian rubles and the yuan, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk said at the Boao Forum for Asia last month.

Such developments show the strong vitality and potential of China-Russia economic cooperation, which enjoys a high degree of trade complementarities, political mutual trust and diversified areas for cooperation. All these factors together constitute a strong foundation for bilateral trade, enabling it to withstand challenges amid the complex international environment.

SHI JIE launches seasonal collection in Hangzhou

Fashion brand SHI JIE releases its 2024 A/W collection “The Child of Nature—Rough Jade” in Hangzhou, East China’s Zhejiang province on March 30, 2024. [Photo provided to chinadaily.com.cn]

SHI JIE, the eponymous fashion brand by Chinese designer Shi Jie, released its 2024 A/W collection “The Child of Nature—Rough Jade” on Saturday in the E-Fashion Town of Hangzhou, East China’s Zhejiang province.

Compassion and care make the impossible possible in China

Editor’s noteWe have asked expats living in China to share their stories about the cities they work and live in. Janaka Jayawickrama is from Sri Lanka and he is now professor of social anthropology at Shanghai University.

Janaka Jayawickrama from Sri Lanka is now professor of social anthropology at Shanghai University. [Photo provided to chinadaily.com.cn]

Moving from the United Kingdom after 20 years to China is an exciting decision our family had to make. However, we did not know what to expect. We kept our minds open.

We are a family of three. My wife is a designer, my son is an artist, and I am an academic.

We were thrilled when I received the opportunity to join the College of Liberal Arts of Shanghai University. We wanted to learn from new experiences, culture and society.

My campus story is also a collective story of my wife, my son and I.

If I had to pick three words to describe this story, they would be: compassion, care, and collaboration.

Based on my experiences of traveling across many continents over the past 30 years, moving to a new country always comes with challenges.

Language, social structures and expectations are the most difficult ones. When we first arrived in China in November 2022, everything seemed difficult. We did not understand the language. We were not familiar with social structures. We did not know what to expect and what was expected of us.

It soon became clear that what we thought was difficult could be overcome with compassion and the care we received from everyone.

My colleagues at all levels of the Shanghai University were compassionate and caring towards me and my family.

Difficulties of language, social structures and expectations became less difficult as through compassion and care.

I remember a young student once took time to explain to me how to use a new application on the phone. A colleague also took time to accompany me to the bank to open an account. A security guard also once helped me to access the QR code to enter into the campus. An old woman once spoke to us even though we did not understand the language. These are all examples of comfort and the warmth we have experienced in Shanghai.

Alternative Asian supply chain to replace China not feasible, experts at Boao say

This photo taken on March 25, 2024 shows the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA) International Conference Center in Boao, South China's Hainan Province, is ready for the upcoming forum. The BFA Annual Conference 2024 will be held from March 26 to 29 in Boao, focusing on how the international community can work together to deal with common challenges and shoulder their responsibilities. Photo: cnsphoto

This photo taken on March 25, 2024 shows the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA) International Conference Center in Boao, South China’s Hainan Province, is ready for the upcoming forum. The BFA Annual Conference 2024 will be held from March 26 to 29 in Boao, focusing on how the international community can work together to deal with common challenges and shoulder their responsibilities. Photo: cnsphoto

An alternative Asian supply chain to replace China, as some Western media outlets have suggested, is not feasible, said an author of a report released on Tuesday by the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA), which convened its 2024 conference in Boao, a resort town in South China’s Hainan Province.

According to the forum’s Asian Economic Outlook and Integration Progress flagship report, China maintains its position as a regional hub in the global value chain, despite increasing risks in global trade and investment.

Lin Guijun, former vice president of the University of International Business and Economics, also an author of the report, told the Global Times on Tuesday that although there have been some changes in the global value chain and supply chain, it is not feasible to establish an alternative supply chain that can replace China’s status in Asia.

The Economist, a UK-based magazine, recently came up with an idea Altasia, a shorthand for the alternative Asian supply chain, which it believed had the potential to provide alternatives to China’s supply chains in the coming years.

Lin noted that there have been some shifts in industrial chains, but the overall volume is small. 

Despite the changes, China maintains its dominant position in intermediate goods trade in Asia, with 20 of the 22 largest component products still being led by China, Lin said, citing the report. Additionally, there has been a significant increase in trade volumes of telecommunications components, batteries, and electrical machinery centering around China in recent years, Lin added.

“It will be difficult for other countries to replace China’s leading position,” Lin said.

As China’s industrial system is undergoing a transformation and upgrading, there is a need to relocate some labor-intensive processes or industries overseas, to optimize resource allocation, Hu Qimu, a deputy secretary-general of the digital-real economies integration Forum 50, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

However, in terms of high-end industrial chains, especially those related to the digital economy, many countries may not have the necessary infrastructure, such as internet connectivity, that China possesses. This is the key factor that makes China irreplaceable in this aspect, Hu said.

The report pointed out that the global reliance on China’s value chain in 2022 remained higher than in 2019, underscoring the competitiveness of Chinese factories.

The report also pointed out that China and ASEAN retain central positions in the Asian trade of goods, with China’s export competitiveness evident in its growing trade with other Asia-Pacific economies.

China’s foreign trade got off to robust start in the first two months of 2024, expanding 8.7 percent after achieving 0.2 percent growth in 2023, a “hard-won achievement” amid headwinds.

Zhou Shixin, a research fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, told the Global Times on Tuesday that China – as the second largest-economy in the world – plays a crucial role in the global supply chain network.

“Due to its deep integration into the global economy, it is not easy for any country to completely strip out China from the global supply chain. Similarly, China also relies on the integrity and stability of the global supply chain for its own economic development,” Zhou said.

The Asian economy is expected to grow by around 4.5 percent in 2024, surpassing the level of 2023, and remain the largest contributor to global economic growth, according to the report.

The accelerated development of digital trade, the recovery of tourism in Asia, continuous progress in economic and trade arrangements such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, and the positive effects of the restructuring of Asian value and industrial chains on regional economic integration, are expected to gradually emerge and add new impetus to Asian trade and investment.

Apple reportedly seeking partnership with Baidu on using its AI solution

A flagship store of Apple in Shanghai Photo: VCG

A flagship store of Apple in Shanghai Photo: VCG

Apple has reportedly sought a partnership with Chinese search engine Baidu to provide generative AI solution in its devices sold in China. The US tech company is introducing AI to augment its operating system and other software. 

Media reports have suggested that Apple will use Baidu’s Ernie Bot – a generative artificial intelligence product for its iPhone 16, Mac OS and iOS 18 in China.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Apple had held preliminary talks with Baidu about using the Chinese company’s generative AI technology in its devices in China, though, “Apple’s discussions with Baidu are still exploratory,” the report said citing people familiar with the matter.

For Baidu, this will be a huge driving force, especially as competition among major large language model (LLM) application manufacturers in China becomes increasingly fierce, analysts said. 

Similar to other AI services, Baidu’s Ernie Bot is accessible via an app accessible from the App Store. According to Baidu, after its LLM application announced its opening to the entire society on August 31, 2023, it quickly climbed to the top of the Apple Store’s free app rankings, becoming the first native Chinese AI product to top the app store rankings in China.

According to CNBC, Apple will lay the groundwork for a new AI App Store at Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference in June. 

“The company will offer its own AI services, but now it is in discussions with other companies to offer their AI apps for sale, possibly as part of an AI App Store,” an American Apple analyst was quoted as saying by CNBC on Monday.

The progress came amid Apple chief executive Tim Cook’s recent visit to China, when talking about the critical role China plays for the US tech giant. “There’s no supply chain in the world that’s more critical to us than China,” Cook said.

Facing the pressure of AI competition, Apple’s decision to cooperate with Chinese companies to accelerate AI application is a wise decision, Chinese experts said.

The fact that Chinese LLMs are favored by foreign tech companies indicates that the US’ approach to contain China’s technological development will not only restrict US investment in high-tech industry in China, but also expedite China’s tech self-reliance efforts, reducing China’s dependence on external supplies, the experts said.

“The ongoing cooperation between Apple and Baidu reflects the deep integration of the global industry chain,” Wang Peng, an associate research fellow at the Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

Also, major companies in the world are increasingly aware that going it alone is difficult to cope with the rapidly changing market, Wang said, adding that only partnership could bring more business opportunities and development space for them.

“Chinese companies like Baidu can also gain more opportunities through cooperation with Apple and others, achieving a win-win situation,” Wang said.

From Apple’s perspective, choosing a compliant and secure AI solution will help Apple better adapt to varied regulatory environment. At the same time, it also shows that Apple values the Chinese market and complies with its regulations, said Pan Helin, a member of the Expert Committee for Information and Communication Economy under the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

Wang said that Apple still needs China – the world’s largest smartphone and consumer electronics market – to sustain its growth momentum. 

The US government has tried to contain the rise of Chinese high-tech sector in order to maintain its technology dominance in the world, experts said.

China is now actively developing cutting-edge AI technology including large language models, Wang said. “These tech innovations are expected to help China break the sci-tech blockade imposed by the US.”